Twitter and News feeds
Search this site
Networked Blogs
« Science Online 2011 | Main | Can you ID this jellyfish? »

Slow down = mow down?

This post was chosen as an Editor's Selection for

Manatees in Florida are a battle hardened lot.  A large proportion of the sluggish sea cows have injuries from boat strikes, which is something of an occupational hazard when you live in the heavily trafficked coastal waterways of the sunshine state.  Indeed, lots of manatees have multiple scars from a lifetime of encounters with leisure craft, and boat strike is the biggest human cause of manatee deaths in that state.  The solution seems obvious, right?  Slow down!  Give the manatee a chance to get out of your way, and maybe human and manatee can live together, sharing the coastal waterways in relative harmony.  But what if that’s exactly the wrong thing to do?  What if that makes things worse?  How could that be, and what should we do instead?  Science to the rescue…

When legislation was first introduced to slow coastal recreational boats in manatee habitat, the number of boat strike injuries went up, yes up. Significantly.  Enter acoustics experts Ed and Laura Gerstein.  Through a painstaking research program into the hearing capabilities of manatees and the soundscape of Florida waterways, the Gersteins teased apart the problem and showed its surprising and counterintuitive basis.

The research began with studies to determine what a manatee can hear.  This is not as easy as it might seem.  We’ve all had audiograms done: they put you in the little booth with the headphones and ask you to press a button if you hear a sound.  They systematically play different frequencies at different amplitudes and, by your button, you paint a response curve for them about what you can and can’t hear.  Well, with manatees, the principle is the same, but the execution was a bit different, because you can’t ask a mantee whether or not it heard a sound.  Or can you?  Actually, you can train a mantee to push a paddle with its nose when it hears a sound (in exchange for a monkey chow biscuit), using the same training approaches as any mammal training.  Once the manatee has that behaviour down reliably, you can play it, under controlled conditions, all the frequencies and amplitudes of a typical audiogram, and thus determine what it can hear.  Its a great example of training (operant conditioning) as a research tool.  It took the Gersteins over a year at the Lowry Park Zoo in Tampa to train two manatees to do this, and 4 more years to complete the sound study, but the resulting audiogram held the key to unlocking the boat strike problem.  The Gersteins showed that manatees are not very good at hearing low-frequency sounds and that their peak sensitivity to sound is up in the 14-16KHz range (which would be audible but very high to human ears). 

 Next they went to the waterways and measured the ambient sound and then the sounds of boats traveling at different speeds.  And there it was, the answer:

What a manatee can hear is represented by the grey line - if its above the line, then they can hear it, if below, then they can’t.  Thus the background noise (the black line) is below what a manatee can hear - they live in a largely silent world.  A 27ft recreation powerboat zooming by right overhead is the red line - they can certainly hear that!  The same boat when its 16 seconds travel away (the pink line) cannot be heard yet.  But heres the kicker: slow the boat down to 3mph (5kmh - the blue lines) as the law requires, and the response curve drops below what a manatee can hear, even if the boat is right on top of them.  Slowing the boat down means that you’re effectively sneaking up on the hapless mammal, so that they never know what hit them.  The effect is exacerbated by two other things.  Firstly, a slower boat not only makes less noise (its “quieter”) but it also makes lower frequency noise (basically, it rumbles, not whines) and as we saw earlier, manatees don’t hear well down in the low frequencies.  Secondly, to make it even worse, there’s something called the Lloyd mirror effect, where low frequency sounds are muffled or even cancelled out completely in  shallow water, because the sound waves reflect off the surface of the water and the bottom and negate each other in the water column.  The sum of these three factors - boat amplitude, boat frequency and Lloyd mirror - is that manatees are effectively deaf to recreational boats in shallow water.  These results also explained why manatees also get hit by barges, which are large and move very slowly.  In another study, the Gersteins showed that this was made worse by a sort of sound shadow that occurs in front of a barge because the propellers are at the back and their sound proagates behind, but not in front of, the vessel.  Thus even a large and slow barge can still sneak up on a manatee.

Never fear, this story has a happy ending.  The Gersteins have taken the knowledge they gained through this elegant research and turned it into a solution to the problem: a device that can be attached to the front of every boat to emit an alarm sound that manatees can hear and thus avoid.  In this endeavour they’ve been sensitive to the problem of “sound pollution” in the coastal environment.  By using flanking ultrasound emitters, the device focuses the alarm sound in a 6 degree wedge in front of the vessel, making what Ed describes as a “laser of sound”.  Validation studies are showing that manatees in the vessel path do hear the alarm and take evasive action and that, importantly, this effect doesn’t wear off.  In other words, they never grow accustomed to or ignore the alarm sound.

This seems to me a great example of science showing that the obvious (slowing down) is not always the correct course of action in a complex world.  It reminds me of well-intentioned minimum legal size limits for recreational and commercial fisheries, which can cause fishers to take the largest and most fecund fish in the population or, worse still, take all the females in those species that change sex as they grow.  Through careful and time consuming bioacoustics research, with a healthy dose of animal training in an aquarium setting, the Gerstein’s may well have helped save countless manatees from future harm.

Gerstein, E. (2002). Manatees, Bioacoustics and Boats American Scientist, 90 (2) DOI: 10.1511/2002.2.154

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (5)

One thing to note, however, is that the slowing done serves other purposes than protecting manatees (which we now know it doesn't, really cool research!) In areas on the East Coast of Florida, specifically the Indian River Lagoon, keeping boats slow also reduces the impact that high wakes can have on mangroves, oyster beds and sea grass beds, all of which are keystone species in an already fragile ecosystem.

I love the idea of the high frequency alarm, I hope it gets implemented statewide here in Florida.
November 13, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAmy McKenna
Actually manatees have by far more acute hearing than was demonstrated by Gerstein. In addition his sample size was really tiny, two (!) animals. Boat noise has spectra that spread across the range of frequencies and it also overlaps with manatees' own vocalizations spectra. In addition manatees have very good sound localization abilities and will localize the sound source with no problem. Manatees own calls are very quiet thus they need to have very sensitive ear to hear and find other manatees..

Manatees do hear boats, all boats even idling boats, but it does not mean much to them. The thing is that the Florida manatee has no natural predators and this is how they evolved. There is no way manatees that have not been hit could associate boat sound with any danger, so there is no reason to avoid it. For example beluga whales and harbor seals have one common predator: a killer whale. Thus they have evolved to associate killer whale's calls with danger and will leave the area once they hear it. But it is not the case with manatees. If you have no natural predators there is no way you will be sensitive to a sound that has been introduced in your habitat for only last 50-60 years.
November 13, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterManatee_Research
@Manatee_Research: Can you provide a link to some of the scientific research that backs up your claims?

By that, I mean the claim that manatees hear all boats and the claim that when they hear an unfamiliar sound, they do not react to it.

Flight distance evolution in animals doesn't require the animal to be familiar with each new entity it encounters, for example. It certainly doesn't require the animal be exposed to each new entity for an indeterminate time greater than 50-60 years to give evolution time to work on it.

Manatees have great sound localization abilities at higher frequencies. However, lower frequency sounds like slow-moving boat propellers are omnidirectional and difficult to localize before you even add in the handicaps of the manatee's range of hearing and Lloyd's Mirror interference. The higher-frequency warning alarms helped manatees hear and avoid boats, even though they'd never been exposed to the sound before. It's a tool that helps them identify the boat so they can learn to avoid it.

The published article is actually a good read and addresses your questions in much greater detail than this blog entry:
November 14, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterSkeptic
You had me at monkey chow biscuit. This was a really interesting article about how by applying what we think would be good for us as humans doesn't always translate into what's good for other animals. Thanks for sharing such interesting research!
November 14, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterStephanie Maslow Blackman
This has been debunked by a group of Florida biologists, the Manatee Technical Advisory Council. From page 263 of "Manatee Insanity: Inside the War Over Florida's Most Famous Endangered Species" (University Press of Florida, 2010):

"The Manatee Technical Advisory Council, after conducting two workshops on the
subject, concluded that Gerstein and Blue were wrong because 'manatees can
hear sounds in the frequency range that boats make.” As for the Gerstein-Blue
warning device, the MTAC reported, 'It is not at all clear that wild animals in
a natural setting have the cognitive ability to recognize a particular sound as a
danger or determine how to escape.'

"One of the major flaws with the warning device that Gerstein and Blue had
proposed involved simple logic. Before manatees would learn to associate the
warning signal with danger, biologists pointed out, they would have to be hit
by a boat after hearing the signal. If that one hit didn’t kill them, then maybe
they would learn what the signal meant. However, it might take repeated clobbering.
It was like training convenience-store clerks how to deal with robberies
by allowing robbers to shoot them a few times.

"Even then, there was no assurance manatees would know where the warning
signal was coming from, given how sound travels underwater. Nor would
they automatically know which way to swim to get out of the way.

“'The animals sometimes dive or appear to move toward deeper water when
approached by vessels, but have also been observed to turn or move toward an
approaching boat,' the MTAC report noted."
November 23, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterCraig Pittman

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.